Re: RE: 3923 vs. 3924

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 10:25:29 EDT


Yeah yeah yeah...get technical on me Richard. ;)

- Bernd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard A Pyburn" <rap777@juno.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: DML: RE: 3923 vs. 3924

> Correction, the engines after 1996 seem to be notoriuos for pinging.
>
> Richard in San Antonio
>
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 07:51:33 -0500 "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
> writes:
> > Our engines are notorious for "pinging" and the 3923's (along with
> > making
> > very slightly more power) work rather well. Coming from a VERY avid
> > SplitFire user (Me), I switched to them as well and love'em.
> >
> > Depending on the factory gap, I wouldn't go more than .05" larger
> > for the
> > MSD. I know MSD recommends about .010" larger but i've eaten up
> > plugs that
> > way.
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: RE: RE: 3923 vs. 3924
> >
> >
> > So why would I want a colder spark? This is just a little bit of a
> > confusing idea to me.
> >
> > Also do I just leave them gapped as is with my MSD?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 10:58 PM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: RE: 3923 vs. 3924
> >
> >
> > The 3924's are the stock heat range for our trucks. The 3923's are
> > one step
> > colder.
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:28 EDT