Re: RE: 3923 vs. 3924

From: Richard A Pyburn (rap777@juno.com)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 09:22:30 EDT


Correction, the engines after 1996 seem to be notoriuos for pinging.

Richard in San Antonio

On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 07:51:33 -0500 "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
writes:
> Our engines are notorious for "pinging" and the 3923's (along with
> making
> very slightly more power) work rather well. Coming from a VERY avid
> SplitFire user (Me), I switched to them as well and love'em.
>
> Depending on the factory gap, I wouldn't go more than .05" larger
> for the
> MSD. I know MSD recommends about .010" larger but i've eaten up
> plugs that
> way.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: 3923 vs. 3924
>
>
> So why would I want a colder spark? This is just a little bit of a
> confusing idea to me.
>
> Also do I just leave them gapped as is with my MSD?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 10:58 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: 3923 vs. 3924
>
>
> The 3924's are the stock heat range for our trucks. The 3923's are
> one step
> colder.
>

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:28 EDT