How fast was the 01 R/T??? In July Truck Trend they pulled 15.0 in the 1/4
from a RC R/T......
Thanks, Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stlaurent Mr Steven" <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> The test difference between the 2000 and the 2001 model were about almost
a
> second. It was a shame to see a QC outrun a R/T or with the same results,
> not from one test magazine but from two others showing the same results.
>
> Auto World did a test on the 2001 R/T and it was a lot faster than the
2000
> model.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Stewart [mailto:firebird@kymtnnet.org]
> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 5:50 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
>
>
>
> WHat do you mean "corrected" and runs in the 15s??
>
> -Ryan
> 99 DA RC R/T
>
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steven St.Laurent" <Saint1958@home.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 4:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> >
> >
> > > I don't want to flame anyone but the 2001 R/T was corrected and runs I
> the
> > > 15s again. Fill sorry for the 2000 owners though. Check the test
drive
> by
> > > Auto World Weekly.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of jim miller
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 12:10 PM
> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > Subject: Re: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > 2001 RC R/T has an Invoice of $17,500.
> > > > The 2000 Ford Lighting Invoice of $27,300.
> > >
> > > STILL looks like $10,000.00 More to me!!!!!!!!
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:32 EDT