Depending on the weather, greasy track or lane, and you know the driver
mistake in shifting. But that is within a small margin of error that can be
overcome not a full second or more.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Stewart [mailto:firebird@kymtnnet.org]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 12:38 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
Wait, if he 00 R/T ran a 15.0, and the 01 ran a 15.2, wouldn't the 00 be
faste rthan the 01??
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stlaurent Mr Steven" <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> 15.2 seconds. Now that is what I call accuracy
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Stewart [mailto:firebird@kymtnnet.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 11:47 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
>
> How fast was the 01 R/T??? In July Truck Trend they pulled 15.0 in the 1/4
> from a RC R/T......
>
> Thanks, Ryan
> 99 DA RC R/T
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stlaurent Mr Steven" <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 2:47 PM
> Subject: RE: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
>
>
> > The test difference between the 2000 and the 2001 model were about
almost
> a
> > second. It was a shame to see a QC outrun a R/T or with the same
results,
> > not from one test magazine but from two others showing the same results.
> >
> > Auto World did a test on the 2001 R/T and it was a lot faster than the
> 2000
> > model.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Steven St.Laurent
> > Test Engineer
> > Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> > MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> > 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> > Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> > Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Stewart [mailto:firebird@kymtnnet.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 5:50 PM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> >
> >
> >
> > WHat do you mean "corrected" and runs in the 15s??
> >
> > -Ryan
> > 99 DA RC R/T
> >
> >
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steven St.Laurent" <Saint1958@home.com>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 4:42 PM
> > > Subject: RE: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> > >
> > >
> > > > I don't want to flame anyone but the 2001 R/T was corrected and runs
I
> > the
> > > > 15s again. Fill sorry for the 2000 owners though. Check the test
> drive
> > by
> > > > Auto World Weekly.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of jim miller
> > > > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 12:10 PM
> > > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > > Subject: Re: DML: R/T vs. Lightning
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > 2001 RC R/T has an Invoice of $17,500.
> > > > > The 2000 Ford Lighting Invoice of $27,300.
> > > >
> > > > STILL looks like $10,000.00 More to me!!!!!!!!
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:33 EDT