Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Fri Aug 25 2000 - 17:01:52 EDT

Next message: FalRan66@aol.com: "Re: RE: Next Gen Dakota"
Previous message: Steven St.Laurent: "RE: Goodbye.....it's been great!"
In reply to: Steven St.Laurent: "RE: RE: Re: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters"
Next in thread: David Albrecht: "Re: Intense Performace Cone Filters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

942CFM according to K&N calculations.

- Bernd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven St.Laurent" <Saint1958@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 3:44 PM
Subject: DML: RE: RE: Re: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters

> Is it true Bernd that the 6x9 is sucking over 1000CFM?
>

Next message: FalRan66@aol.com: "Re: RE: Next Gen Dakota"
Previous message: Steven St.Laurent: "RE: Goodbye.....it's been great!"
In reply to: Steven St.Laurent: "RE: RE: Re: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters"
Next in thread: David Albrecht: "Re: Intense Performace Cone Filters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:41 EDT