Is it true Bernd that the 6x9 is sucking over 1000CFM?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of Bernd D. Ratsch
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 5:16 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters
The standard 6"x9" is more than adequate for our engines. Supercharged,
TurboCharged, Nitrous, or a combination thereof.
(Hmmm...Blown-Turbocharged-Nitrous-Breathing-Dakota......naaaahhhh.) ;)
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Kyle Kozubal
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 7:00 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters
> As a direct quote from K&N: "We build the open end conical filters for
> several different manufacturers, but they don't flow as well as the
standard
> cones."
>
> They're right too...I did a home "Smoke Test" and found that it doesn't
pull
> air from the cone, but rather from the outer sides near the opening to the
> intake tube.
So K&Ns are still the preferred choice then over ANYTHING??? Bernd, what
size cone filter would you recommend to flow plenty of air into the engine?
Kyle
93 Dakota 4x4 V6
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:41 EDT