RE: RE: 4.7 RT?????

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Mon Aug 28 2000 - 10:48:54 EDT


Again not much difference in modification for an R/T.

-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: Sam Parthemer [mailto:srp@home.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 9:46 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: RE: 4.7 RT?????

Was it in Los Angeles?

If so, I've seen it... the guy had RT suspension on it. He wanted an RT,
but the quad cab fit the bill for him.

Now he wants hotchkis suspension.

Sam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Shawn Villaire
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 5:23 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: 4.7 RT?????
>
>
> Ok guys get this....I just saw(for the second time) a 2000 Dak QC, Amber
> fire, with RT rims, badges on the tailgate and doors that said "4.7
> R/T"(stock decals, not homemade) The truck was lowered to R/T height, and
> had the same tailpipe that normal R/T's have. The truck didn't have
> manufactures plates on it either. Anybody heard or seen such a thing? Or
> did this guy put a lot of effot into "making" his quad cab an R/T. It
> looked really good too!
>
> Shawn
>
> =====
> 00 CC 4X4 Sport, 4.7l,flowmaster cat-back, k&n homebrew open air
> filter,180 t-stat,autolite 3923's,more to come....
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:43 EDT