I have 3.92's in it now, so what's the difference?
-Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [SMTP:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 1:04 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed-kinda long
>
>
> Doug,
>
> Coming from experience, you want to change the gears with 32's to 3.90's.
>
> - Bernd
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greig, Doug" <douggr@hazelett.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:44 AM
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed-kinda long
>
>
> > Thanks to all who have replied. Everything you all have said is true. I
> > should just ignore their ignorance and their lemming like attitudes and
> > enjoy my truck. I'm still planning on continueing with my mods. As far
> as
> > the engine goes, after the eRam, I'll install headers and
> exhaust,.....and
> > maybe a chip, but than I want to go after the body. I got the
> instructions
> > and parts list for the 3" body lift. Than I'll put 32's on her ( would
> like
> > 33's, but I don't want to change my rear gearing....yet (I have the 3.92
> SG
> > now) and hopefully for christmas this year I'll get the genuine steel
> > brushguard, nerf bars, tail light covers package from 4wheel parts
> > wholesalers! I already have a matching fiberglass cap from A.R.E. which
> I
> > think looks cool. I want her to look nice and be able to handle normal
> > off-roading conditions. If I wanted something for the rubicon, or to
> drag
> > race, I would buy something specifically designed for those areas. I
> wanted
> > something in the middle, and that's why I chose my Dakota. "I" believe
> it's
> > the best choice to do what I want. Again, thanks for the words of
> > encouragment.
> >
> > -Doug
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:46 EDT