RE: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 22:43:42 EDT

Next message: Steve Preston: "Re: DML : off topic"
Previous message: Tim J Koth: "RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed 4.7L TQ curve"
In reply to: Steve Preston: "I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
Next in thread: Hemikota@aol.com: "Re: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hehehe...you should see what they do Blown. ;)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Steve Preston
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:20 PM
To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
Subject: DML: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little
4.7s!

It`s because my V6 has less rotating mass! I knew it!! I tell ya,those
4.7s are real DOGS as far as acceleration.I mean it`s just NOT THERE!
But my 3.9? SHOOOOWEE!!

1999 Dakota Sport RC 4X4 V6 A/T 3.92 Anti-Spin w/Infinity CD system and
optional crank windows (2)

Next message: Steve Preston: "Re: DML : off topic"
Previous message: Tim J Koth: "RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed 4.7L TQ curve"
In reply to: Steve Preston: "I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
Next in thread: Hemikota@aol.com: "Re: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:51 EDT