Re: Hughes' or QuickD TB?

From: Terry Herrin (therrin@isaac.net)
Date: Mon Sep 04 2000 - 01:00:13 EDT


"Doug Myers" <dougmyers@starpower.net> wrote:
> I'm looking into getting a ported throttle body, and I've narrowed my
>choices down to either the Hughes' Engines TB or the QuickD TB. I'm leaning
>toward the Hughes', mainly because they keep the stock throttle blades, and
>it still flows 106cfm more than stock. They also use a thin throttle shaft,
>and polish the airhorns and bores. That and it's only $165.

I have the QuickD and I'm very satisfied. Not sure what the advantage
of keeping the stock throttle blades would be. The QuickD uses thin
blades and a thinner shaft.

Terry Herrin
99 FR CC R/T
14.769 @ 91.43
Wilmington, NC
http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dakota.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:25 EDT