Sam, What mods have been done to your engine?? I'll agree the 4.7L won't
beat the 5.9L in the Torque dept., but beat them it will, and does,
regularly ;) And not "Heavily modded" either, atleast not yet :) Only
point I was trying to make with Jack was it wasn't a 50 ft. lbs difference
in the two engines. I never said the 4.7L had more TQ.
__________________________________
Matt--VA--Y2K-HEMI `00 Sport Plus RC
4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD, Homemade air intake,
3" Flowmaster cat-back, Bosch +4's
14.48 @ 92.40 MPH
209.9 RWHP/285 RWTQ
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
-----Original Message-----
<From: Sam Parthemer [mailto:srp@home.com]
<Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:47 PM
<To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
<Subject: RE: DML: R/T difference Re: Jack
<Mine puts out 327 ft lbs. of torque to the rear wheels, and 237 hp...
<I also have had a few 5.2L (still have one), and even if a 5.2L doesn't
<have the HP of a 4.7L, it does have more torque... and the 5.2L isn't
<a match for a 5.9L in the torque department... No way. I've driven the
<4.7L... I like it. But it won't be able to beat a 5.9L unless heavily
<modded.
<Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT