Uh but we already know a stock 4.7 Standard will in fact be a stock R/T.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Parthemer [mailto:srp@home.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:47 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: R/T difference Re: Jack
Mine puts out 327 ft lbs. of torque to the rear wheels, and 237 hp...
I also have had a few 5.2L (still have one), and even if a 5.2L doesn't
have the HP of a 4.7L, it does have more torque... and the 5.2L isn't
a match for a 5.9L in the torque department... No way. I've driven the
4.7L... I like it. But it won't be able to beat a 5.9L unless heavily
modded.
Sam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Barret, Matt
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:37 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: RE: DML: R/T difference Re: Jack
>
>
> Jack, I beg to differ on this. What kinda TQ figure does an RT put out at
> the rear wheels??
>
> __________________________________
> Matt--VA--Y2K-HEMI `00 Sport Plus RC
> 4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD, Homemade air intake,
> 3" Flowmaster cat-back
> 14.48 @ 92.40 MPH
> 209.9 RWHP/285 RWTQ
> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>
>
>
> -----Original Message follows----
>
>
> From: W. Jack Hilton III [mailto:HEMI@charter.net]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 10:26 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T difference
>
>
> Well, all I know is that the R/T has a pant-load more torque than the 4.7
> will ever have. It's all in the displacement. Given the spread on torque
> figuers between the two, I will take the R/T any day of the week.
>
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
> W. Jack Hilton III
>
> Newnan , GA
>
> HEMI@charter.net
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
>
> ICQ#: 32611901
>
> AOL Instant Messenger: "DwnSth69"
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT