RE: eRam vs Jet2 ,attn: Bernd

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 19:02:22 EDT


Hmmmm....the eRam worked on higher RPM's and the Jet-II gave me more bottom
end (and mid) "grunt". BOTH!! :)

$220 is pretty good...I had purchased mine back in early '98 for about $250.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Greig, Doug
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:57 AM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: DML: eRam vs Jet2 ,attn: Bernd

Bernd,

 I was looking through the truckperformance.com website this morning
(pricing headers, brakes, etc.) and saw that they had the Jet2 chip for the
3.9 for $220.00. I had no idea that's what they cost. I thought they were
aroung $400. Which would give me a more all around performance, the eRam or
the chip? I know, I know...I pestered you long enough about the eRam, but
like you said, it's only for WOT use. I still thinks it's cool and really
like it on my truck so far. The sound of it kicking in alone has sold me on
it, but I started thinking about the way I drive and the actual amount of
times I floor it. Let me know what you think.

 Doug Greig
 Winooski VT
 98 CC 4X4 V6 Sport
 K&N Gen II w/ Super eRam
 Mod'd V8 TB
 Accel Coil/Wires



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:27 EDT