Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

From: Ransom T Holbrook (ransom@setel.com)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 20:20:58 EDT


"Just make sure the 4.7 is an automatic" Why??

I think the comparison should be the 'fastest' of the 2 configurations.
That's the point.

If you insist that the 4.7 must be equipped with an ATX, then we have to
increase the displacement of the 4.7 to match the R/T....apples vs. apples

----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Herrin" <therrin@isaac.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

> ABadDakota <bad93dakota@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Why don't we just get one person with a 4.7, and one with the R/T and put
this topic to rest FOR
> >GODS SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Sounds good to me. Just make sure the 4.7 is an automatic with 3.92
> gears, both have the same cab, and both bone stock, and we'll be all
> set to make a fair comparison.
>
> Terry Herrin
> 99 FR CC RT
> 14.769 @ 91.43
> Wilmington, NC
> Dakota R/T Club,Executive Board,SE Region
> http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dakota.html
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:27 EDT