Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

From: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 13:25:31 EDT

Next message: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com: "Re: another Dakota Believer"
Previous message: Ed Morris: "Mopars @ ATCO Sat. 9/23"
Maybe in reply to: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Next in thread: SHELBACK@i-star.com: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Reply: SHELBACK@i-star.com: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hell Steven,
I'd just settle for some basic stuff for the 2001 4.7. Like a MOPAR HP
PCM for a start. I could start from there.
SEMIHEMI01 (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD, K-N Cool-Air, SilBlades
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>

Next message: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com: "Re: another Dakota Believer"
Previous message: Ed Morris: "Mopars @ ATCO Sat. 9/23"
Maybe in reply to: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Next in thread: SHELBACK@i-star.com: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Reply: SHELBACK@i-star.com: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:27 EDT