RE: RE: I want to stay on the DML

From: Ryan Stewart (firebird@kymtnnet.org)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 02:11:55 EDT


No, no, no. I was comparing the 5.4 to the 5.9 NATURALLY ASPIRATED. No SC.
:)

-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:05 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: I want to stay on the DML

In a message dated 9/11/2000 4:44:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
fast4x4@nc.rr.com writes:

<< the Eaton compared an aftermarket SC on an R/T or other cehivles like a
> CamBird or Mustang for that matter. I actually think Ford did a pretty
 good
> job on the 5.4 (though NA it doesn't make as much torque as the 360), but
> their choice of SC was bad, they don't work well together at all......
>
> -Ryan >>

    A 5.9 makes 440 ft lbs of torque ?..The roots style SC'er make boost
instantly, low end torque is awesome...Don't kno what you mean ???

                        Ted O.
    99 SLT + 4X4, 318 ci, Powerdyne SC'er w/11 # pulley, Leach headers,
Gibson stainless catback, TransGo shift kit, R&D TB, K&N, Taylor wires,
Autolite 3923's, 4.10's front and rear, Hoosier Drag slicks, Msd Boost
retard
ignition, Auto meter Boost gauge, fuel pressure guage...1.7 roller
rockers...24# injectors...M1 intake manifold...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:31 EDT