RE: RE: Ok, I got this really crazy idea......Bill

From: Barret, Matt (MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 15:50:03 EDT


Yep, the intake duration is 244 and the exhaust is 254. Definitely room for
improvement here, especially on a higher rpm engine!! ;)

Matt
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

-----Original Message-----
From: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com [mailto:SEMIHEMI01@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 3:14 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Ok, I got this really crazy idea......Bill

I agree Matt, It's only going to breath just so deep with the cam the it
has.
Maybe a little more rocker ratio or duration, then the need for more flow
migh
t be needed. I've got a friend with a 600cu.in. FERD cranking 1100 hp and
he's only running a 1100 cfm Holley and he don't run lean at all. (he's bad
to the bone too) he carries the front wheels over the 60' mark.

SEMIHEMI01 (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD, K-N Cool-Air, SilBlades,
10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:32 EDT