GS,
Yes! The cam and MPI work very well together. Only thing I might do
differently if I were re-installing it today, is advance the cam about 4º to
bring the power curve in a little sooner. I may be going to a different cam
in the next couple weeks. I'm presently cooresponding with Hughes about
some torque improvements. Since my emissions test went so well, I have some
room to play with.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: GSWillhite [mailto:GSWillhite@ualr.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 4:35 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re:FYI - VA Emissions Test
Good to know in case a certain Democrat is elected,
who knows what kind of emission laws we'll be dealing
with.
Rich, how do you like that cam and mpi combo? Does
it have consistant power/pull to top end? Thanks!!
GS -
> Just thought some of you Virginia DML'ers might me interested in this. I
> just took my '96 in for it's biannual emissions test. Passed with flying
> colors. So you might ask "What's the big deal?" I ran it with all my
> performance mods in place; nothing removed or returned to stock. Readings
> were slightly less than half the allowable limits. I think this says a
lot
> as to just how clean/efficient our engines are performing. Here's the way
> it was tested. This was on a 318 with a 5-speed tranny.
>
> K&N FIPK, F&B TB, MPI intake, 24lb. injectors, Hughes HER0612AL cam, JBA
> headers, Mopar PCM, 180º tstat, relocated air intake sensor
>
> Rich - Ashburn, VA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:42 EDT