Re: rant: why Crower sucks

From: Steven T. Ekstrand (cyberlaw@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2000 - 01:33:29 EDT

Next message: Ohm347@aol.com: "Re: looked into the JL stealthboxes"
Previous message: Chris Oertell: "Re: Any half-way decent trucks in So Cal???"
In reply to: mike d.: "Re: rant: why Crower sucks"
Next in thread: Gmblows@aol.com: "Re: rant: why Crower sucks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

| Man, I get that a lot!!
|
| The cam's Part number is 604. It doesn't actually have .604 lift.

Whew! I thought you were going to have to change your sig description to
"Project 11's" :-)

-STE

Next message: Ohm347@aol.com: "Re: looked into the JL stealthboxes"
Previous message: Chris Oertell: "Re: Any half-way decent trucks in So Cal???"
In reply to: mike d.: "Re: rant: why Crower sucks"
Next in thread: Gmblows@aol.com: "Re: rant: why Crower sucks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:44 EDT