Re: 4.7L JET module

From: Steven T. Ekstrand (cyberlaw@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Oct 10 2000 - 14:26:30 EDT

Next message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: Street-Legal Supercar"
Previous message: DAK4JLB@aol.com: "Re: Stupid question"
In reply to: Jon Smith: "Re: 4.7L JET module"
Next in thread: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Re: 4.7L JET module"
Maybe reply: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Re: 4.7L JET module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I never paid attention to the actual number, I was just pointing out the
relative numbers. The Ram 5.9L was much much higher than every other
comparable vehicle tested. Both before and after the chip.

Next message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: Street-Legal Supercar"
Previous message: DAK4JLB@aol.com: "Re: Stupid question"
In reply to: Jon Smith: "Re: 4.7L JET module"
Next in thread: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Re: 4.7L JET module"
Maybe reply: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Re: 4.7L JET module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:56 EDT