Why did the Dakota they tested, score so poorly, yet the Durango they
tested, did well with simular damage?
Walt Felix
88½ Dakota Sport 4x4, 2000 Ram 1500 QuadCab Sport 4x4 and a 67 Barracuda
Coupe 340/4Speed
Walt@Walt-n-Ingrid.COM
http://WWW.Walt-n-Ingrid.COM
http://WWW.MoparsinMotion.COM
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:39:39 -0500
From: "Ryan Stewart" <firebird@kymtnnet.org>
Subject: Re: DML: 97-01 Dakota Crash test poor
I've seen all the poor crash tests, but with the numerous amounts of wrecks
on the RTML, and people coming and writing about the wrecks hours later, I
just think the tests can't be realistic.........
- -Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <SEMIHEMI01@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: DML: 97-01 Dakota Crash test poor
> The key is don't be in a crash... Noticed the used a 1998 Dak.
>
> SEMIHEMI01 (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD, K-N + Cool-Air,
SilBlades,
> 10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT, GIBSON 3" Single Side-Swept cat-back, G-TECH,
> <A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>
>
------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:03 EDT