Yea I know but that is not our comparison model either. I guess what we
should do, as I said before, add two chain to each of the Dakota/Tacoma
rears and see who will win.
"A FORMER CONVERT FROM TOYOTA & HONDA BELIEVERS"
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Fast4x4Dakota@aol.com [mailto:Fast4x4Dakota@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:19 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Icky truck
In a message dated 11/6/00 7:47:13 AM Pacific Standard Time,
STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil writes:
> Check out the thickness of the sheet metal and the size of the rear axle.
> Bahahahahha It just wants to make you laugh. Even the Tundra rear end
looks
> weak.
I wouldn't be so quick to criticize a Toyota rear end, they are AS strong as
a 8 3/4" Chrysler and that's behind a 4cyl, the V-6 rear is even bigger,
take
a look at a Land Cruiser axle some time, the axleshaft is larger than a Dana
70.
Luke
1996 Black 4x4 Dakota, SLT CC SB, 318, 3" 2 Chamber Flowmaster cat back
exhaust, 9" open element Mr. Gasket Air cleaner, 52mm Ported TB, 3923
Autolites, A-518 / 46RE, 3.55 geared Peg Leg 8 1/4, 31x10.50 BFG Mud
Terrains, Alpine CD player, Infinity Kappa Speakers.
Coming soon: E-Body 8 3/4" Rear axle, 3.55 gears, Detroit locker, 10"
Brakes,
and Moser Engineering custom alloy axles!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:08 EDT