I really don't know which part, I have to go back and find the story.
I had to laugh at the Tacoma, I could not even think of fitting behind the
wheel and claimed it is a club cab. Now the Tundra looks more beefier than
it's predecessor the Tacoma. I just hate the crap advertisement that
doesn't hold weight.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Fast4x4Dakota@aol.com [mailto:Fast4x4Dakota@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 1:17 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Icky truck
In a message dated 11/7/00 12:50:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil writes:
> Now that would be interesting. Is it true the 2000 axle are now hardened
> Aluminum?
That I do not know, it would be interesting to look into. Further point
counter point chit chat... It really doesn't matter which rear is stronger
in the long run, especially if you don't like the styling of the Toyota,
LoL,
in which case it could have a Millitary 2 1/2 ton planetary axle and you
wouldn't care, anywho, I'll look into the Aluminum deal, do you mean the
shat
them selves or the housing, or the 3rd member?
Luke
1996 Black 4x4 Dakota, SLT CC SB, 318, 3" 2 Chamber Flowmaster cat back
exhaust, 9" open element Mr. Gasket Air cleaner, 52mm Ported TB, 3923
Autolites, A-518 / 46RE, 3.55 geared Peg Leg 8 1/4, 31x10.50 BFG Mud
Terrains, Alpine CD player, Infinity Kappa Speakers.
Coming soon: E-Body 8 3/4" Rear axle, 3.55 gears, Detroit locker, 10"
Brakes,
and Moser Engineering custom alloy axles!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:08 EDT