239, or 238????

From: Chris Hannon (cannon@kansas.net)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 00:46:23 EST

Next message: Ronald Wong: "RE: 239, or 238????"
Previous message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Viper/Dakota Map Modifier(build for 10 bucks)"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "RE: 239, or 238????"
Reply: Ronald Wong: "RE: 239, or 238????"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I was looking in my '95 Dakota FSM. It says the 3.9L V6's are 238 cubic
inches. I know it's not a big difference, but it just seems weird that
the FSM would have 238 and everyone calls it a 239 (including me).
Anyone have any idea who's right?

Later,
Chris Hannon

Next message: Ronald Wong: "RE: 239, or 238????"
Previous message: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Viper/Dakota Map Modifier(build for 10 bucks)"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "RE: 239, or 238????"
Reply: Ronald Wong: "RE: 239, or 238????"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:25 EDT