RE: 239, or 238????

From: Ronald Wong (ron-wong@home.com)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 01:01:33 EST


It's 237.9 so 238 is correct. The multiplier is 61.

Ron
00 SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
For modifications see my DML Profile

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Chris Hannon
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:46 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: 239, or 238????

I was looking in my '95 Dakota FSM. It says the 3.9L V6's are 238 cubic
inches. I know it's not a big difference, but it just seems weird that
the FSM would have 238 and everyone calls it a 239 (including me).
Anyone have any idea who's right?

Later,
Chris Hannon



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:25 EDT