Re: RE: ATI Procharger for 4.7 135-140 RWHP gains

From: Ryan Stewart (firebird@kymtnnet.org)
Date: Thu Nov 30 2000 - 17:50:35 EST


No, most companies take the HP at the flywheel..... Or I tihnk soa t leas?

-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
Ecstatic if he had 250RWHP and 345RWTQ bone stock!

----- Original Message -----
From: Batman <batphreak@whatthefuck.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 7:28 PM
Subject: DML: RE: ATI Procharger for 4.7 135-140 RWHP gains

> The 230HP rating for Dakotas is taken at the Rear Wheels....It's an SAE
net Horsepower rating. since 1972 all companies have been using that
rating.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> "Ryan Stewart <firebird@kymtnnet.org>" said:
>
> It equals 370, but it's talking RWHP, not crank HP.
>
>
> -Ryan
> 99 DA RC R/T
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <SEMIHEMI01@aol.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:40 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: ATI Procharger for 4.7 135-140 RWHP gains
>
>
> > Chris,
> > Maybe I can't add but 140 gain + 230 already ='s 270hp
> >
> > SEMIHEMI01@AOL.COM (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD
> > K-N + Cool-Air, Quick-D TB, 10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT, SilBlades
> > GIBSON 3" Single Side-Swept cat-back G-TECH, <A
> > HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:47 EDT