I'm suspecting this can be accomplished without interior modifications on
the 4.7 engine. Now with durability of the drive train is a mystery.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Stewart [mailto:firebird@kymtnnet.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:51 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: ATI Procharger for 4.7 135-140 RWHP gains
No, most companies take the HP at the flywheel..... Or I tihnk soa t leas?
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
Ecstatic if he had 250RWHP and 345RWTQ bone stock!
----- Original Message -----
From: Batman <batphreak@whatthefuck.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 7:28 PM
Subject: DML: RE: ATI Procharger for 4.7 135-140 RWHP gains
> The 230HP rating for Dakotas is taken at the Rear Wheels....It's an SAE
net Horsepower rating. since 1972 all companies have been using that
rating.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> "Ryan Stewart <firebird@kymtnnet.org>" said:
>
> It equals 370, but it's talking RWHP, not crank HP.
>
>
> -Ryan
> 99 DA RC R/T
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <SEMIHEMI01@aol.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:40 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: ATI Procharger for 4.7 135-140 RWHP gains
>
>
> > Chris,
> > Maybe I can't add but 140 gain + 230 already ='s 270hp
> >
> > SEMIHEMI01@AOL.COM (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD
> > K-N + Cool-Air, Quick-D TB, 10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT, SilBlades
> > GIBSON 3" Single Side-Swept cat-back G-TECH, <A
> > HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:47 EDT