Re: 14.51 1/4 mile R/T???

From: Ryan Stewart (firebird@kymtnnet.org)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 14:08:22 EST


Hey Alan,

Actually, Duner ran 14.61, he's not the 14.51 R/T. His time is much more
incredible though because he was a 98 model AND a Club Cab. Anyhow, I don't
know, I was just trying to see what the current fastest stock R/T is.

-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T

----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Short <ashort@flash.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: DML: 14.51 1/4 mile R/T???

>
>
> "Bernd D. Ratsch" wrote:
>
> > Just remember people...no like engine is built alike. Some have more
power
> > than others...some ping and other don't (we've already seen that).
> >
> > So, if he ran a 14.51 with his stock?? R/T...well, what do we have to
> > disprove that? Now the only thing I didn't see was if any mods were
done to
> > the R/T...and more than likely, there were some mods done since the
figures
> > don't add up on the HP vs. 1/4 mile et and speed.)
> >
>
> I've had a R/T for about as long as anybody(3/98).
> I remember when Dana B. Shane W. and Mike C. all were in the low 14's.
> None of them did it on RS-A's, but all with very few mods.
> Maybe a K&N drop in or a JET.
> Duners 14.51 was "suspect" when it happened, too. Go back and look in the
> archives for all the flames he took over it. That truck NEVER had a speed
> limiter from the day he got it.....sounds like a Mopar performance
computer was
> installed before he bought it(or something)......but it was "stock" as far
as he
> knew.
> In short, don't get all excited about low 14 stock R/T's, they're very few
and
> far between.
> Alan S.
> 16.24 @ 84 bone stock 2 k miles
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:59 EDT