Mike, you are the customer that MB thinks it can sell it boring line of junk
too. I am in the same age group and wouldn't even consider even buying one.
--------------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
2000 Dakota 4.7 Hemi (beta I testing)
1999 Chevy (gone in 2003)
1993 Tracker (still going...going)
2000 Roush Mustang Stage II (sold) TT
----------->:)
Aspiring for the next toys:
2003 Dakota Hemi R/T
2003 GTS-R Viper
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Miles Harris
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 12:24 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@twisted.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: Anti Daimler - changed mind...
I'm relatively new to this list and my Dak is my first Dodge so my
loyalties aren't deep routed, however, having been the victim of corporate
takeovers and restructuring, I'm ready to take up the fight to save
Chrysler and "Rage Against the Machine" so to speak (yes, even though I'm
50, I do know there is a rock group by that name, good, but I like
Offspring and Green Day better).
So sign me up. Send me names and addresses of who I need to write to. If
one of you creates a web page dedicated to the cause send me the link and
I will add the link to my website. If we decide to have a protest drive
around Chrysler headquarters or the annual board meeting, I'll be there, if
not physically at least in spirit.
Let the battle began, even if we fight and lose, it is better to fight for
something we love then to sit idly by and watch it slowly die.
-- Miles Harris III Simi Valley, CA 01 Silver Dakota CC Sport, 2.5L, 5speed 01 Gold Saturn SC1 (3 door coupe) 1.9L SOC, 4speed auto"Tom (Silver89)" <SilverEightynine@aol.com> wrote in article <3A3A7101.877CC5CA@aol.com>... > You have a real good point Jon and I agree. I think I will draw up a web site > anyhow. But more along the lines of what you said. "Voice our opinions - save > our company" and not a "bash Daimler" sort of a deal. > > Jon Steiger wrote: > > > I'm not saying that the actions of one individual (or even a large group > > of people) would do any good, but I know that sitting idly by and letting > > everyone think we are perfectly OK with the takeover and subsequent bone- > > headedness definitely won't do any good... Voicing our displeasure might > > just help to bring others to awareness about the situation and provide fuel > > to those folks who *can* make a difference... > > It sure does seem that way doesn't it. This sounds like an inside joint > effort. A bunch of Chrysler excs. get a big payoff from the deal, and > Schrempp gets another toy bin to play with. They should make a Hollywood > movie out of all this when its over. > > > However, just because Eaton was a wimp doesn't make it right. Schrempp > > lied, plain and simple, this whole idea was a bad one from the start, and > > those people interested in seeing it through (Schrempp, Eaton, and probably > > others) did whatever they could to sneak it by the shareholders. (Anyone > > remember the shareholder report where they tried to skew the truth by using > > two different currencies?) Eaton walked away with a big fat check and left > > Chrysler to rot. > -- > Tom > http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine > Site Updated - on 12/7/00 > 1989,V6,Auto,8 footer,4x2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:00 EDT