weight does not have to be entered to run 1/4 mi runs on the g-tech. It is
only used to figure horsepower
ttyl
Scott Miller
89 Shelby Dakota #322 - 360 C.I. V8 (12.25 @ 112.41 mph) "FASTDAK"
95 SLT CC V8 5.2 auto
----- Original Message -----
From: Ronald Wong <ron-wong@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 5:28 PM
Subject: DML: RE: RE: Just G-Tech'd my truck again
> Perhaps it's a weight problem? ;-)
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Steven St.Laurent
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 2:20 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: Just G-Tech'd my truck again
>
>
> I run a 14.7 on a G-Tech and a 15.8 at the track what gives?????? How
really
> accurate are the G-Tech???
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> 2000 Dakota 4.7 Hemi (beta I testing)
> 1999 Chevy (gone in 2003)
> 1993 Tracker (still going...going)
> 2000 Roush Mustang Stage II (sold) TT
> ----------->:)
> Aspiring for the next toys:
> 2003 Dakota Hemi R/T
> 2003 GTS-R Viper
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Bernd D. Ratsch
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 12:46 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Just G-Tech'd my truck again
>
>
> Well, I was a little bit bored and decided to dust off the G-Tech and test
> out the truck again:
>
> First Run:
> 17.81 @ 77mph (Oops...lit up the tires..hehehe)
>
> Second Run:
> 15.64 @ 88mph
>
> Third Run:
> 15.77 @ 87mph
>
> Fourth Run:
> 15.69 @ 88mph
>
> So...I know the G-Tech is fairly accurate on my truck (tested at the track
> on a few runs and it's within .03 of the actual times) so we'll take #2 -
#4
> and average them:
>
> 15.7 @ 87.6mph
>
> Not bad.... :)
>
> - Bernd
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:01 EDT