Hehe, 911 is double the price of Viper, so some who could afford a Viper
couldn't necassairly afford a 911. :)
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
I wouldn't pay more for the slower, not as awesome looking, not as good
handling, foreign car anyhow.
----- Original Message -----
From: The Man From Utopia <tmfu@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 10:00 PM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Neon Vs Viper GTS
> 12/19/2000 7:48:02 AM, Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
wrote:
>
> >Not really since the stock version only can produce a 1/4 mile in 16.X
> >seconds. There is nothing to read.
>
> Maybe in your book...
>
> >Garnishing another 5-6 seconds off the Neon stock version, is nothing to
> >debate about but a complete reqengineering ($$$$$) process of the vehicle
to
> >make go faster.
>
> But like Jon mentioned in a previous email, to sum it up.. Some like to
build what they want, some can afford to buy what they want...
>
> >In the end, I rather opted for a vehicle already has the HP/TQ factor and
> >then add some more streetable/strip HP/TQ.
>
> And I opted for something that won't bust my wallet and give me the most
bang for the buck, still pass up several gas stations before a fillup, can
do AutoX,
> and still be practical. Since I prefer AutoX (SCCA Solo I ES), the Neon is
the best suited for that type of racing that is within my budget. Believe me
if I had
> enough disposible income to afford a Viper it would be sitting in my
driveway(actually a Porsche 911 would be) right now.
>
>
> Greg
> NE #3779
> 2K1 Dodge Neon ES
> Rahway NJ
> ICQ# 283886
> http://24.6.89.18/Neon
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:05 EDT