Re: 4.7 Dyno Run - Matt

From: Bruce Bridges (bbridges@flometrics.com)
Date: Thu Dec 21 2000 - 12:41:05 EST


Bill,
 didnt know tony was boring em out 1.5mm. The flow should be better. The
68mm has a 65mm throat.. The 65mm has a 63mm throat. If youn port the 65 to
a 65 it will flow like a 68 with a 65mm throat... I think youve got more
potentail gains with the ported 68mm though... Steve's motor seems to like a
lot of additional air. Im thinking of stepping up to a 70mm prototype to
find the "limit"
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: <WMBARRET@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: DML: 4.7 Dyno Run - Matt

> Damn Bill, what are ya trying to do to me?? :) give me a curve ball??? Do
> you still have the original 68mm TB??? I'll swap you a polished 65mm for
it :)
>
> Matt Y2K-HEMI
>
> In a message dated Wed, 20 Dec 2000 3:56:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> SEMIHEMI01@aol.com writes:
>
> << Matt,
> The 68 mm won't flow stock as well as a 66.5 will polished. I can
prove
> that by the G-tech gain (5HP) I got from a 66.5 polished over the stock
68.
> Plus: it hits the rev limiter a lot harder than before. Bill
>
> SEMIHEMI01@AOL.COM (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD
> K-N + Cool-Air, Quick-D TB, 10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT, SilBlades
> GIBSON 3" Single Side-Swept cat-back, G-TECH, <A
> HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>
>
> >>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:06 EDT