Re: Anyone running 4.10s? (4.10 -vs- 3.92) (Getting new gears Tues)

From: TedsLIGHTNING@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 23 2000 - 08:21:02 EST

Next message: TedsLIGHTNING@aol.com: "Re: TO ALL >> HAPPY HOLIDAYS"
Previous message: Fast4x4Dakota@aol.com: "Perfect 8 1/4 FS CHEAP"
Maybe in reply to: William H. Hiatt III: "Anyone running 4.10s? (4.10 -vs- 3.92) (Getting new gears Tues)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 12/22/2000 3:57:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
bad93dakota@yahoo.com writes:

<< I am sure the 4.10's would
be fine, but I am VERY happy with my 3.91's.

Tom
>>

4.10's are perfect for all around performance and streetability..I had
them in my 99 and turned about 2200 rpm's at 70 with 31" tires..

Ted O,, Black 00 "L"

Next message: TedsLIGHTNING@aol.com: "Re: TO ALL >> HAPPY HOLIDAYS"
Previous message: Fast4x4Dakota@aol.com: "Perfect 8 1/4 FS CHEAP"
Maybe in reply to: William H. Hiatt III: "Anyone running 4.10s? (4.10 -vs- 3.92) (Getting new gears Tues)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:06 EDT