Re: RE: SPANKED ME A 2001 5.2 RC DAK LAST NITE

From: Ryan Stewart (firebird@kymtnnet.org)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 14:21:49 EST


There wer eno 5.2s in 2000 either......

-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
5.9 here.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Wong" <ron-wong@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: SPANKED ME A 2001 5.2 RC DAK LAST NITE

> Badging could be pre-2000 also. If 2000, however, RC's do not have 5.9
> unless R/T, else only QC's can have 5.9. If pre-2000, only R/T's have
5.9,
> else if V8 would be 5.2. <FLAME OFF>
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Stlaurent Mr Steven
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 7:44 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: RE: DML: RE: SPANKED ME A 2001 5.2 RC DAK LAST NITE
>
>
> I wondering if it was a 5.9. hehhehehehehe <FLAME ON>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com [mailto:SEMIHEMI01@aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 7:11 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: SPANKED ME A 2001 5.2 RC DAK LAST NITE
>
> Guys, It had to be a 2000 it had badges on front fenders. Still ain't
> complaining. Bill
>
> SEMIHEMI01@AOL.COM (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD
> K-N + Cool-Air, Quick-D TB, 10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT, SilBlades
> GIBSON 3" Single Side-Swept cat-back, G-TECH, <A
> HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:26 EDT