I just used 12 oz/30 secs as an arbitrary figure to illustrate to Chris the
difference beween trickling water into the tb versus letting an in-fender
air intake suck as much water as it can. My point is still valid(even more
so with your 8 oz/2 min flowrate).
Patrick Delgado
>
> What?!? Where'd you come up with 30 seconds? This is done over a period of
> close to two minutes.
>
> If you're saying that this breaks engines...Yeah...right. You don't POUR
> it...you trickle it down. (And you don't pour the whole cup down at once
> either.)
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Patrick Delgado
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 6:37 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: Removing carbon build up??
>
>
> (12 oz water/30 secs) X (1 gal/128 oz) X (7.8 gal/ 1 cu ft) = a tiny bit
> 2000 cc displacement X (5000 revolutions/1 minute) = a(engine-busting)lot
> Patrick Delgado
>
>> Man ..you could be right but that sounds crazy :) I've always been told
> not
>> to let water get into the intake filter because it will lock your engine.
>> Now your saying it will turn to steam? I guess all those ricers with the
>> cold air intakes going into thier fenderwells don't have to worry about
>> sucking water up then? Please explain!
>> Chris
>> Mangano
>> 2000
>> Supercharged R/T
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:31 EDT