RE: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

From: aaron (aaro@enteract.com)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 12:31:26 EST


Bernd wrote >>68 mm - Seriously. << I read <<<68 mm - Seriously? >>> got
to get my eyes serviced.

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Bernd D. Ratsch
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:29 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

I was also talking about the 68mm TB (Single Bore) for the 4.7L. (Our
Magnum V6 and V8's only take a max size of 52mm)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of aaron
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:30 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

Bernd, he is talking about a 4.7---one hole not two, if you were getting
excited you could probably cut the divider out of your twin bore and use one
big oval blade 42mm x 100+mm, I think that would give it more air. Just a
thought.

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of bernd@texas.net
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:34 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

68mm - Seriously.

- Bernd

> I am looking to upgrade the TB on my 2000 4.7L and have a question: Would
> it be better to replace the original 65MM TB on the 2000 4.7L with a
QuickD
> version, or to simply replace it with the 68MM TB from the 2001 4.7L?
>
> Bob Tucker
> 2000 CC, 4.7, 3.92 ASD,
> IP Cold Air Intake
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:48 EDT