Re: Back on the list

From: mike d. (miggitymike@fast4x4.net)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 16:54:16 EST

Next message: bernd@texas.net: "Re: RE: Magnum 3.9 vs Mitsubishi 3.0 V6's...which is better?"
Previous message: Ryan Stewart: "Re: Got to test drive a Viper this past weekend,well try this for looks.."
In reply to: Colucci Dan: "Back on the list"
Next in thread: dwmagnum: "Re: Back on the list"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>>I would probably pull and sell the 5.2 complete intake to oil pan
but I am not sure what to charge. It currently has 66K on it and runs
strong<<

I'll give ya $15 and a 6er of Budweiser fer it =)

seriously, I paid $900 for a complete 95' 360 with wiring harness still on
it and a waranty from a boneyard (70k on it), so I wouldn't think you could
get much more than that for it.

-miggity

PROJECT 13's --> slammed 88 Dakota / 360 swap in progress!!
miggitymike@fast4x4.net
http://surf.to.Project13s

"STOCK SUCKS!"

Next message: bernd@texas.net: "Re: RE: Magnum 3.9 vs Mitsubishi 3.0 V6's...which is better?"
Previous message: Ryan Stewart: "Re: Got to test drive a Viper this past weekend,well try this for looks.."
In reply to: Colucci Dan: "Back on the list"
Next in thread: dwmagnum: "Re: Back on the list"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:10 EDT