Re: 68mm 4.7l tb

From: Richard R (richster@san.rr.com)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 13:09:27 EST

Next message: Jef Denning: "Re: Bud Shootout .. broadcast schedule"
Previous message: WPG: "Re: hesitation on highway-'99 R/T"
In reply to: John Clawson: "68mm 4.7l tb"
Next in thread: WOT or waiting at a Red: "Re: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb"
Reply: WOT or waiting at a Red: "Re: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

That is a good question. Shouldn't the horsepower/torque specifications for
the 2001 model year truck increase due to the larger throttle body?

'01 Dakota Quad Cab
Richard

--
"John Clawson" <johnc@asltg.com> wrote in message
news:3A8411D9.175AA87B@asltg.com...
> Thanks to Patrick and James(?) for the lead on 68mm tb.
> Now that I've spent the $, can I expect noticeable gains over my 65mm
> without modifying it?
>
> TIA
> jc
> 00 Sport,cc,4.7,4X4,auto,3.92sg,
> Quickd air,Flowmaster,180 tstat,Jet II
>

Next message: Jef Denning: "Re: Bud Shootout .. broadcast schedule"
Previous message: WPG: "Re: hesitation on highway-'99 R/T"
In reply to: John Clawson: "68mm 4.7l tb"
Next in thread: WOT or waiting at a Red: "Re: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb"
Reply: WOT or waiting at a Red: "Re: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:12 EDT