Re: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb

From: WOT or waiting at a Red (dakatack@home.com)
Date: Sat Feb 10 2001 - 03:09:22 EST


Richard

Not with the extra two Catalytic converters that were added.

Patrick O'Day
2000 Dakota 4x4, 4.7L, CC
Ztube w/9 inch big mouth filter
68 MM TB Ported and Polished
Rancho 9000 Shocks
Robert Shaw 755 180F Thermostat
Mobil 1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: DML: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb

> That is a good question. Shouldn't the horsepower/torque specifications
for
> the 2001 model year truck increase due to the larger throttle body?
>
> '01 Dakota Quad Cab
> Richard
>
> --
> "John Clawson" <johnc@asltg.com> wrote in message
> news:3A8411D9.175AA87B@asltg.com...
> > Thanks to Patrick and James(?) for the lead on 68mm tb.
> > Now that I've spent the $, can I expect noticeable gains over my 65mm
> > without modifying it?
> >
> > TIA
> > jc
> > 00 Sport,cc,4.7,4X4,auto,3.92sg,
> > Quickd air,Flowmaster,180 tstat,Jet II
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:12 EDT