Re: 68mm 4.7l tb

From: Viper450hpGTS@aol.com
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 17:20:43 EST

Next message: Seth Hollander: "Re: Re: Jack in the Box Antenna balls"
Previous message: Seth Hollander: "Re: Jack in the Box Antenna balls"
Maybe in reply to: John Clawson: "68mm 4.7l tb"
Next in thread: WOT or waiting at a Red: "Re: 68mm 4.7l tb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 2/9/2001 10:08:33 AM Central Standard Time,
johnc@asltg.com writes:

<<
Thanks to Patrick and James(?) for the lead on 68mm tb.
Now that I've spent the $, can I expect noticeable gains over my 65mm
without modifying it?
>>

I would expect so....

James

Next message: Seth Hollander: "Re: Re: Jack in the Box Antenna balls"
Previous message: Seth Hollander: "Re: Jack in the Box Antenna balls"
Maybe in reply to: John Clawson: "68mm 4.7l tb"
Next in thread: WOT or waiting at a Red: "Re: 68mm 4.7l tb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:12 EDT