If I'm not mistaken, it'd be more than that. The '92's are OBD-1 aren't they?
And the 2000's are OBD-II? I was going to put a '98 360 with 30,000 miles in my
'95 Dakota but one was OBD-I and the other OBD-II, so I decided not to screw
with it. You'd probably have to change a lot of stuff. Do it, and let us know
how it goes!
Chris Hannon
95 Dakota
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:26:03 -0600
> From: "Tom (Silver89)" <SilverEightynine@aol.com>
> Subject: Re: DML: 1992 Dakota Engine Swap
>
> As far as I know - it should be a direct swap. Only thing you wold need
> would be the computer. The 92 might work - but I would put in the new one
> just for the heck of it.
>
> Kendall Ross wrote:
>
> > Is it a drop in for my 1992? Are there modifications that I will need to
> > make and will it fit right up to my 92 manual transmission? Also, would I
> > use the 92 computer or the 2000 model? Thanks for all your help!
> >
> > Kendall Ross
> > Fort Smith, AR
>
> - --
> - -------------------------------------------------------------
> "She has a face that would make an onion cry"
>
> Tom S.
> http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine
> Site Updated - on 2/5/01
> 1989,V6,Auto,8 footer,4x2
> 1989,V6,Auto,8 footer,4x4 w/snowplow (woohoo!!)
>
> ------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:18 EDT