I would appreciate any guidance from the group. I enjoy the learning process
and don't mind re-inventing the wheel some times. I do want to avoid any
long hard dead ends though. I like to study this stuff but I don't want to
waste too much time and effort on unproductive pursuits.
Patrick O'Day
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Wong" <ron-wong@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:32 AM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Modifing pulses and analog signals to the PCM
> Yeah I know. I don't have an Unsend button on Outlook....;-) I should
have
> said Hypertech but they don't make it for Dak's, but anyways, there have
> been attempts to do this out in the automotive computer world. Now if
there
> were a way to team up with Ron Zimmer, that would be extremely
advantageous
> to everyone concerned. Some of these numbers that everyone wonders about,
> he would have the answer or could probably get the anwers a lot faster
than
> having to go back through and re-invent the wheel, especially in the area
> where fuzzy logic's being used to derive a certain outcome.
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of bernd@texas.net
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:14 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Modifing pulses and analog signals to the PCM
>
>
>
> Ron, the Jet chips aren't programmable.
>
> BTW: I'll let ya all know how the Programmable Timing Computer works
> tomorrow. (Got it from KRC Performance - Thanks Marty!) :)
>
> - Bernd
>
> > That's what the Jet chip attempts to do.
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: Modifing pulses and analog signals to the PCM
> >
> >
> > I've been reading all the post, current and archive, to try to
understand
> > the PCM in my Dak better. The reason I am interested is I have been
> > considering the possibility of using a small PLC (programmable logic
> > controller) to interface key sensors to the PCM. Coupled with a simple
OI
> > (operator interface) you could take the incoming signals, buffer them
> (read
> > change them) and send them on there way to the PCM.
> >
> <snip>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:53 EDT