Bruce, you da the man...
--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
(Work) 760-725-2506 (DSN: 365)
(Work) mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
(Home) mailto:saint1958@home.com
"In fact, my work has already proven
itself to be correct. People such
as you just haven't gotten it yet.
(unknown author)
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Bridges [mailto:bbridges@flometrics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:27 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......
FYI!
F&B magnum V8 50mm TBs flow about 550CFM @ 11", 790cfm @ 25"
The 69mm 4.7s Target is about the same. I havnt got the final product yet,
so I havnt been able to do any flow work.... I wont release until we get at
least 750CFM @ 25" (should be real easy!)
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 6:02 AM
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......
>
> That's what I thought....just seemed strange that there was no measurement
> specs and 454CFM. No biggie...
>
> I believe Bruce's are around 780-800CFM (from what I got on the phone
earlier).
>
> - Bernd
>
>
> > Bernd, You and I are use to seeing 25" h2o, Dave usually does both!
400
> cfm@ 10" is 630
> cfm@ 25", and 450 cfm @ 10" is 712 cfm@25"
> >
> > Steve, what kinda flow numbers is Bruce getting out of his design??
Price??
> >
> > Matt Y2K-HEMI
> >
> > In a message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:17:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> bernd@texas.net
> writes:
> >
> > <<
> > 454CFM?? Are you sure those numbers are correct? Seems rather small
for a
> > 4.7L. (Considering that the 3.9L is at 500+CFM)
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:58 EDT