RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Exhaust backpressure (TECH!)

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Wed Mar 21 2001 - 20:50:11 EST


(1) Modified Throttle Body (Flometrics)
(2) 3" Pipe from the cat on back. (through a 3" IN/OUT) muffler of course)
(3) Mopar Headers with Y-Pipe

Performance Shop: Austin Performance (Lamar and Braker)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of John Bell
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:40 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: RE: Exhaust backpressure (TECH!)

""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
news:GGEILDJAAAEBOABJIJLLCEBCFJAA.bernd@texas.net...
>
> They told me that the system I have may be a little but too much for the
V6
> on bottom end. It actually improved it with the 10psi boost from my
> Powerdyne.
>
> - Bernd

Cool... what would you recommend re: exhaust for a 5.9 n/a which had a
throttle body / intake upgrade
(like, say, a QuickD or similar setup) and nothing else? Would getting a
custom Y-pipe in addition help
things any? The reason I am asking:

I plan on going with the standard throttle body / intake / cat-back routine
for my truck, and am curious
as to what combination would be best for a decent (25+ rwhp plus whatever
torque) increase. I am
looking for a balanced solution, nothing too trick, as the only other mods I
have in mind are an ignition
upgrade and synthetic lubricants. Please keep in mind that I drive a 4x4 QC
(for fit/routing etc.).

Just want to let 'er breathe. Oh, and if anyone knows of a decent
performance shop in Austin TX
that is friendly to Daks, please let me know.

Thx in advance.

--
John Bell - '00 QC 5.9 46RE 4x4 NV242 3.92LSD SLT+ *my baby*



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:20 EDT