>From text book descriptions, sure....but from what i've seen from Speed
Density Systems vs. Mass Air, (and that's from the Mustangs) i'll the Mass
Air over Speed Density any day. Uhhhhh....the most advanced factory systems
are a mix of SD and MAF Shane.
There's just too much evidence that this mod works. Not trying to argue
about it with you Shane, but check out the other lists as well.
(Sounds like this is going to be our "Deadlock" like with the O2 sensor and
Open/Closed Loop issue.) ;)
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Shane Moseley
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:40 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: IAT box & dyno results -- tech discussion
I disagree here. MAP-based EFI systems are the more reliable and accurate
type. I
bet you have played w/alot of mustwangs (or most any ford) before as this is
the
typical belief of those guys. Read about it at www.sae.org (Society of
Automotive
Engineers). Ever wonder why the most advanced (factory or aftermarket) EFI
setups
are ALWAYS map-based????
No - in fact - they error on the side of richness because being overly rich
is
always better than getting anywhere close to lean - which melts engines
down. I
don't see how going more rich can possibly help (nor do I see it in Jon's
dyno
graph). Are any of you guys even using an A/F gauge?
Latr,
Shane
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:24 EDT