Re: RE: cat back exhaust

From: Alex Harris (jetcity@swbell.net)
Date: Sun Mar 25 2001 - 10:06:38 EST


On my V6 the greatest loss in low-end power was from cutting in a Flowmaster
3-chamber into the stock pipe - very noticeable, but the high-end gain was
worth it. Didn't notice much loss with the JBA's, but there was a week's
interim before I got them sealed to the Y-pipe correctly, so I didn't have
much of a before-and-after comparo. The Quick-D TB seemed to get me a tiny
bit of low-end back.

Sure wish I had me a G-Tech.

- Alex
'00 RC SLT V6 5-Speed
Profile: http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/SxokV7hSrtCVk

> From: Ronald Wong <ron-wong@home.com>
>
> Not with just the cat back. You have to be careful when you start messin'
> with headers.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Rob M
>
> I have a 99 dakota 4x4 w/ 318. I want to make some changes to the
> exhuast system, but I dont want to lose any low end power. If I get a 3
> inch cat back with a flowmaster muffler, do you think I will lose much
> if any bottom end? Has anyone else done this (just cat back, no headers
> or high flow cat) what were your results?
>
> thanks
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:26 EDT