Re: tire question

From: A. S. (adakota4x4@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 29 2001 - 12:30:40 EST


I'm running the General Grabber A/P's (31x10.5's). I've got 40,000 on them
and look to probably have another 8,000 to 10,000 more. I like them both on
and offroad. Good traction - very little, if any, noise.
--Aaron--
95 DSRC 4x4 V6
www.geocities.com/adakota4x4_95/

>From: axclr8@usa.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: Dakota Post <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: tire question
>Date: 28 Mar 2001 16:43:14 CST
>
>At 35k, my badyears are about shot - thus I am looking at new tires. I
>have
>already decided to stay with the stock 31x10.50 size but I am considering
>more
>aggressive tread. (those $%!!#$% stock RT/S tires get stuck on wet grass -
>don't ask...) My question is this: Between the mid range mud tires (bfg
>mud,
>General M/T, etc.) and the all-out mud tires (Super swampers, gumbo
>mudders,
>etc.) what opinions do you have. Are the super swampers worth the
>inevitable
>mileage hit? Are all of the radial mud terrain tires really created equal?
>Has anybody started running the new SSR's? What about some of the more
>aggressive looking all terrains like the BFG AT or grabber AP's? I am not
>really looking for someone to tell me what's best, just opinions like " I
>bought brand X tires, and I onlt got 5000 miles on them before they were
>used
>up - or I have such and such, and I really like them..
>
> -AXCLR8
>99CC, SLT+, 4x4, 318, LSD, Rolltop, Permatech.
>
>For off-list contact, please include either DML or VFR in your subject line
>to
>keep your Email from being filtered into my trash bin. Thanks.
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:33 EDT