Re: new engines..HEY,dont leave out the 3.9

From: Geoff (geoff_fahl_1@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Apr 03 2001 - 18:11:59 EDT


Hi, I have the 3.9L and it is a good engine. I just wanted to know what
the difference is.

Geoff
""David D."" <dodgedakotaquadcab@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:F72bhyF2fPmsSVhGOD600013ce6@hotmail.com...
> This is a tough engine too.
> The most popular in the Dakota.
>
>
> >From: Jim Miller <jim76712@swbell.net>
> >Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >Subject: Re: DML: new engines
> >Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 22:42:10 -0500
> >
> > > Could anyone explain how the engine is mechanicaly better for me?
> >
> >In reference to the new 3.7 and 4.7 engines, only time will tell. The
318s
> >and
> >360s have done well historically. Many have outlasted the car bodies
they
> >were
> >installed in. The 4.7 does seem to get better gas mileage than the 318
it
> >replaced and maybe have better power over a wide rpm range. I don't
think
> >it
> >may have as much grunt to pull a very heavy load though.
> >
> > > Jim in Waco
> >
> >99 R/T RC, 01 Jeep GC 4.7 4X2
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> David Digney
> 00'QC,SLT+,3.9,42RE,3.55,K&N "Home-Brew" Intake
> Dynomax Super Turbo,Mobil 1 10w30,Mobil 1 Filter
> List Moderator: "DodgeDakotaQuadCab@egroups.com"
>
> Dodge Dakota Quad Cab: "ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES"
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:56 EDT