On the average, a modified TB will show some gains in MPG...I personally
have never heard of 2mpg, but 1-1.5 is close. It could be both though (TB
and Shell). It would also depend on what type of camper
shell...lightweight, aerodynamic shell would help...standard squared off may
not.
$0.02
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of fawcett@uism.bu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:00 AM
To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
Subject: Re[2]: DML: MPG increase after TB install
Somebody had posted some information (wind tunnel stuff) that indicated a
shell
actually increased drag (not to mention the added weight) and was therefore
detrimental to MPG... OTH, a tonneau decreased drag and should therefore
have a
positive effect on MPG. Can't remember the web site or who posted it but it
was
pretty interesting.
If this stuff was true then your new TB is the source of improved MPG.
Tom
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: Re: DML: MPG increase after TB install
Author: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Date: 4/4/01 8:45 AM
I'm more inclined to think the increase is from the shell. I saw some
mileage improvement with the tonneau I added. Still can't say for sure
if the TB added any mileage on my V8.
"Joel ." wrote:
>
> Why do you think the increase is from the TB instead of the shell?
>
> Joel
>
> >Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 23:09:22 -0500
> >From: Alex Harris <jetcity@swbell.net>
> >Subject: DML: MPG increase after TB install
> >To: DML <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> >Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >
> >Well, I've put four tanks of gas through the Dak since installing my
Quick-D
> >TB, and my mileage has gone up by an even 2 MPG (went from 13+ to 15+ in
the
> >city). This is with the addition of a camper shell as well.
> >
> >This was the finishing mod in the intake/exhaust chain, along with cold
air
> >intake, JBA headers and Flowmaster muffler. I don't know all the
mechanics
> >of it, but I' d guess it's more likely that putting that final piece in
> >place is responsible for the gains (getting rid of the last major
> >restriction) rather than just the TB, but I don't know... what do you
more
> >knowledgeable people think?
> >
> >I'm not complaining, though!
> >
> >- Alex
> >'00 SLT RC V6 5-Speed
> >Profile: http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/SxokV7hSrtCVk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:56 EDT