Vague WasRe: vague

From: Hemipower@aol.com
Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 15:25:18 EDT


In a message dated 04/11/2001 2:08:43 PM EST, txqc2000@yahoo.com writes:

> Sean, no problem. After reading your post, I felt my
> comment was somewhat vague, so I thought I'd clarify
> who made it. BTW, an engineering buddy of mine
> speculated that the reason GM had us put their
> vehicles in 2wd while leaving the competitors' in 4wd
> was to ensure that all of the torque would definitely
> be routed to the rear tires instead of being split
> between the front and rear.

Oh sorry there. For a minute I thought you were
implying that GM employed injunears.

>
> --Original Message--
>
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:40:42 -0400
> From: "Sevrence, Sean (S.J.)" <ssevrenc@visteon.com>
> Subject: RE: DML: Limited Slip Differential -- GMC vs.
> Dodge (long
>
> I wasn't implying you were in the wrong! I guessed it
> was an article for the presentation of it.
>
> Sorry if you thought I was attacking ;^P



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:00 EDT